Sig/Rizzini Aurora TT-25


Dear Technoid,

Have you guys had any experience with any of the SIG Aurora”s ??? What about the Rizzinnis in general?? This looks like a slick, well made little O/U, think it will hold up in moderate sporting use??

Thanks for the input!!!!

J

Dear J,

First some definitions: Italy has a bunch of Rizzini makers. The SIG Aurora is made by the B. Rizzini company. That is different from the F.A.I.R. (Fabbrica de Armi Isidoro Rizzini) or the megabuck Filli Rizzini. There’s another Rizzini too, but it escapes me at the moment.

I did a gun review of it for the July 2000 issue of “The Clay Pigeon”. Vic Venters did a review of the Aurora line in the July/August 2000 “Shooting Sportsman” and Rick Hinton just did one in the August 2000 “Sporting Clays”. Between those three magazines, you’ll know all you need to. Of course, my article is the best because mine contains the most barnyard effluent (the true measure of any great gun writer).

I thought that the 32″ bbls on the TT25 were a bit too muzzle heavy and that 30″ would be just about perfect for a sporter. The 32″ bbls were light, but had too much weight right at the tip. Flush chokes instead of the extended Seminoles would help that, but the Seminoles are such nice chokes that I’d give up the two inches of bbl length.

SIG/Rizzini workmanship showed a lot more hand work than the Japanese Brownings or Berettas. I’ve never been much of a Beretta O/U fan because the stock design philosophy doesn’t suit me, but the Beretta 682s hold up well. The 686s I’ve had held up a little less well (forend cracks, ejectors, triggers). Citoris have always held up well. I felt that the SIG/Rizzini TT25 was beautifully designed and carefully assembled. I have no idea if it has any secret weaknesses, but B. Rizzini has been selling that design for a while. It isn’t new, it’s just new to SIG with a new stock configuration. It looks as though it would hold up to considerably more than “moderate” clay target usage, but you can’t tell that stuff until you do it. Everything is replaceable that needs to be, so if it wears it’s no big deal.

I did not find the gun to be particularly light recoiling, in spite of the 5″ forcing cones. That’s probably stock fit. The SIG’s stock fit is very close to the Browning 425/Ultra and not at all like the more dropping, larger pistol gripped Beretta sporters.

I think that the gun is definitely in the same league with the current Browning and Beretta sporters. The new Optima barreled 682 Gold E may have lighter barrels and make the Berettas more attractive to me. The 30″ Browning Ultra XS sporter I shot felt like a pig until you started to shoot it. Then it got really nice. It’s the first gun I have handled that felt worse in the shop than it did on the course. Mostly it’s the other way.

Best regards,

Bruce Buck
The Technoid writing for Shotgun Report, LLC
(Often in error. Never in doubt.)

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Shotguns and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Sig/Rizzini Aurora TT-25

  1. Stan Koehne says:

    I see no mention in the review or original article of the Sig Sauer Sporting Arms 3 and 5 that were made exclusively for Sig Sauer in 97 and 98 by Antonio Zoli of Italy.
    I don’t think Rizzini made any shotguns for Sig, but I certainly could be mistaken on this.
    There was also the Aurora that was made by Zoli for Sig Sauer.
    They are definitely a more expensive over/under than the SA-3 and SA-5 models.
    The forearm and the barrels must be removed in order tor determine the serial numbers on these shotguns.
    Once the barrels are removed, the serial number can be found on the receiver where the barrels attach.
    The serial numbers start with AZ-and then a few numbers.
    There are no recoil pads on the SA-3 and SA-5.
    If there is a recoil pad, the stock has been cut down to accommodate a child or woman.
    I hope this helps you guyers who are interested in the Sig Sporting Arms models.
    They are a fine shotgun for hunting or skeet and have some beautiful engraving on the receiver.

    • Stan Koehne says:

      I must correct an error on my original post.
      The Aurora models were made by Rizzini, not Zoli.
      I believe they were imported by Sig Sauer of New Hampshire.
      They are a very high dollar shotgun, but I cannot attest to how they shoot or their durability since I do not own one.
      I do own the Sig Sauer Sporting Arms 3 made by Antonio Zoli in 97 or 98 only.
      The SA-3 and SA-5 were imported by Sig Sauer in 97 and 98 and both were made by Antonio Zoli of Italy.
      The SA-5 is a more expensive over/under than the SA-3, but I do not know exactly why.
      My SA-3 is a fine Italian made over/under that is good for hunting quail or dove and also good for shooting sporting clays.
      The Zoli North American office is located in Bulverde, Texas just North of San Antonio in a very small suburb of San Antonio.
      They carry cases for the Zoli and also chokes as well as other items.

  2. Joaquin Bustamante says:

    I picked-up an almost-new Sig/Rizzini TT-25 in 20 gauge, from the used rack at a Tucson gun shop a few years ago, despite being in love with my Browning 425 Sporting in 20 gauge. Within 6 months, my beloved Browning was sold and I’ve never looked back. The shotgun just fits me perfectly and makes hitting upland birds a lot easier.

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s