Ask The Instructor:Recoil Sensitivity
Advertisements
Advertisements
-
Recent Posts
- Protect Your Dog’s Joints (2017) December 14, 2018
- Prevent Sniffing (2017) December 13, 2018
- Get Kids Involved (2017) December 12, 2018
- Deliver to Hand (2017) December 11, 2018
- Choke For Sporting December 10, 2018
- Vincent Hancock Interview December 7, 2018
- Caitlin Conner Interview December 6, 2018
- Kimberly Rhode Interview December 5, 2018
- USA Shooting Wins 39 Medals, Eight Olympic Quotas at Championship of the Americas | USA Shooting December 4, 2018
- Briley Choke and Forcing Cones For A Belgian Browning? December 3, 2018
Recent Comments
- key west florida on Velocity Loss Of Old Reloaded Hulls
- Bill on Ports And Taper Backboring
- Fred Leonardi on Nora Ross
- Franklin Pierce on Lefty Auto Duck Gun
- John Titus on Lefty Auto Duck Gun
- jon bastable on Shot Size Selection
- Kev on High Velocity Advantage?
- TH Milstead on 390 Custom Gas Spring
- Ed Sybert on 390 Custom Gas Spring
- Fred Leonardi on Hartmann’s Hint #54: Illness
Categories
Archives
Meta
Advertisements
Advising someone to reduce recoil by lengthening forcing cones or barrel porting is very poor. None other than Sir Technoid, as well as others, have pointed out how those two things don’t reduce recoil enough to be measurable. They probably don’t reduce recoil at all. Surprised that an experienced instructor like Currie would believe and put out such poor advise.
LikeLike
Mr. Currie clearly does not endorse barrel porting. As far as his recommendation on lengthening forcing cones; everyone has their opinion on the effectiveness of this technique.
LikeLike