Ask The Instructor:Recoil Sensitivity
Advertisements
Advertisements
-
Recent Posts
- New Load Data for CHOKE CHOOSER March 25, 2019
- Interview with Alfred Gallifent at the Vintagers 2004 | Shotgun Report® March 22, 2019
- 3″ .410 Shells | Shotgun Report® March 21, 2019
- Shotgun Kicks Off World Cup Season in Mexico | USA Shooting March 20, 2019
- Which Ducker? March 19, 2019
- Open Chokes For Everything March 18, 2019
- Winning Ways Continue For Carroll/Haldeman as Mixed Team Trap Champs of Spring Selection Match | USA Shooting March 15, 2019
- Jungman, Rhode Top Skeet Performers at Spring Selection Match | USA Shooting March 14, 2019
- Clay Target Nation, March 2019, (18-19) March 13, 2019
- Clay Target Nation, March 2019, (16-17) March 12, 2019
Recent Comments
- Mike on Mod/Mod For Everything?
- Peter on Open Chokes For Everything
- Steve Bodart on Browning B-2000
- Parker shooting on Winning Ways Continue For Carroll/Haldeman as Mixed Team Trap Champs of Spring Selection Match | USA Shooting
- Franklin Pierce on Clay Target Nation, March 2019, (18-19)
- Craig Oler on Clay Target Nation, March 2019, (18-19)
- James Jones on Chokes For Clays (Again)
- Gerald A Packard on Low Recoil Skeet Gun
- peter pridgeon on 2-3/4″ Shells In 3″ Chambers, Again
- Joseph Wilkins on The Technoid Takes Gas…..
Categories
Archives
Meta
Advertisements
Advising someone to reduce recoil by lengthening forcing cones or barrel porting is very poor. None other than Sir Technoid, as well as others, have pointed out how those two things don’t reduce recoil enough to be measurable. They probably don’t reduce recoil at all. Surprised that an experienced instructor like Currie would believe and put out such poor advise.
LikeLike
Mr. Currie clearly does not endorse barrel porting. As far as his recommendation on lengthening forcing cones; everyone has their opinion on the effectiveness of this technique.
LikeLike