-
Recent Posts
- Maintaining A Gun Stock Oil Finish June 2, 2023
- Miroku 6000 June 1, 2023
- Devon Gunsmith #8-Beretta SO4 May 31, 2023
- Browning B725 Pro Master May 30, 2023
- Xs The Easier Way May 26, 2023
- Ejector Service Tool May 25, 2023
- Caesar Guerini Invictus IX May 24, 2023
- Webley & Scott 912XS and Vantage May 23, 2023
- Beretta A400 Extreme Plus 12 ga. May 22, 2023
- Exploring The Browning B25 May 19, 2023
Recent Comments
- Thomas Strode on Best Skeet Load
- Marguerite Cassandra Toroian on Hartmann’s Hint #14: Unfamiliar Venues
- Hoyden on Beretta Semi-Auto Cleaning Kit
- Bill E. on Zach Kienbaum’s Beretta DT11
- Roland Leong on Jony Carter’s First US Bird Hunt
- Bill E. on Jony Carter’s First US Bird Hunt
- poly1man on K80 Pro Rib Monarch
- Mike on Jony’s Classic Double 201 SxS
- Roland Leong on Low Velocity Shells
- Bill E. on Belgian Browning Choke Marks
Categories
Archives
Meta
-
Join 293 other subscribers
Shotgun Report® 
I will have the temerity to challenge Mr. Currie to show any empirically based information where porting of shotgun barrels display lessened recoil to the shooter. In addition, the reduction achieved by chamber forcing cone lengthening is very negligible and I have never seen any data to support it either.
Finally, I would submit that short and steep chamber forcing cones are no longer commonly found on any target gun or hunting guns either. They were commonplace decades ago during the card/fiber era to assist in quick sealing of gases behind the shot charge. They have not been used for a very long time now.
Constantly repeating these very old ideas by authorities like Mr. Currie et al, does not make them any more true today than yesteryear.
LikeLike