-
Recent Posts
- Browning Maxus II June 24, 2022
- Old Beretta Semi-Autos June 23, 2022
- Browning Liberty Light June 22, 2022
- Shooting Steel Ammo June 21, 2022
- Snap Caps Or Not? | Shotgun Report® June 17, 2022
- Best 410 Chokes For Game | Shotgun Report® June 16, 2022
- 11-87 Care And Feeding | Shotgun Report® June 15, 2022
- Ithaca Perazzis | Shotgun Report® June 14, 2022
- Yildiz Pro June 13, 2022
- Beretta DT10 Story June 7, 2022
Recent Comments
- blackwellopt on Shooting Steel Ammo
- Bill E. on Shooting Steel Ammo
- Castnblast on Ithaca Perazzis
- Hoyden on Fabarm L4S Sporting
- Hoyden on Beretta A400 Xcel Sporting
- Toby G on Low Pressure, Low Recoil?
- Roland Leong on Barrel Convergence Woes
- Peter Rose on Barrel Convergence Woes
- blackwellopt on Pheasant Shooting With A Perazzi
- Mark on Remington TSS Loads
Categories
Archives
Meta
I will have the temerity to challenge Mr. Currie to show any empirically based information where porting of shotgun barrels display lessened recoil to the shooter. In addition, the reduction achieved by chamber forcing cone lengthening is very negligible and I have never seen any data to support it either.
Finally, I would submit that short and steep chamber forcing cones are no longer commonly found on any target gun or hunting guns either. They were commonplace decades ago during the card/fiber era to assist in quick sealing of gases behind the shot charge. They have not been used for a very long time now.
Constantly repeating these very old ideas by authorities like Mr. Currie et al, does not make them any more true today than yesteryear.
LikeLike