-
Recent Posts
- Barrel Length Preferences | Shotgun Report® September 30, 2022
- Beretta 686 September 29, 2022
- Behind The Scenes At Cole Gunsmithing-Stock Steaming September 28, 2022
- Clay Shooting-Pt. 4-Cartridge Selection September 27, 2022
- Beretta SL2 Launch Edition September 26, 2022
- Bore And Choke Size | Shotgun Report® September 23, 2022
- Behind The Scenes At Cole Gunsmithing-Adj. Combs September 22, 2022
- Jonny Shoots At Ian Coley September 21, 2022
- Orvis Heritage Side-by-Side – Shooting Sportsman Magazine September 20, 2022
- The Venus By Upland Gun Co. September 19, 2022
Recent Comments
- Bill E. on Extended Chokes Vs Flush Chokes
- Brl on Extended Chokes Vs Flush Chokes
- blackwellopt on Bore And Choke Size
- Bill B. on Thumbhole Stocks
- Bill E. on Thumbhole Stocks
- blackwellopt on Wadless Shotshells? – Shooting Sportsman Magazine
- jon bastable on Recoil Spring Replacement
- Bill E. on Jonny Visits CSMC
- blackwellopt on Jonny Visits CSMC
- Edward on Useful Beretta 390 Modification
Categories
Archives
Meta
-
Join 290 other followers
Shotgun Report® 
I will have the temerity to challenge Mr. Currie to show any empirically based information where porting of shotgun barrels display lessened recoil to the shooter. In addition, the reduction achieved by chamber forcing cone lengthening is very negligible and I have never seen any data to support it either.
Finally, I would submit that short and steep chamber forcing cones are no longer commonly found on any target gun or hunting guns either. They were commonplace decades ago during the card/fiber era to assist in quick sealing of gases behind the shot charge. They have not been used for a very long time now.
Constantly repeating these very old ideas by authorities like Mr. Currie et al, does not make them any more true today than yesteryear.
LikeLike