-
Recent Posts
- Jonny at the US Open August 8, 2022
- Beretta 692 August 5, 2022
- Old Browning XS vs. New Browning XS August 4, 2022
- Skeet Stations 5-8 August 3, 2022
- Jony Visits America August 2, 2022
- Gas vs. Inertia August 1, 2022
- Cryogenic Treatment | Shotgun Report® July 29, 2022
- Target Cases, Hunting Loads | Shotgun Report® July 28, 2022
- Hunting Load Velocity Changes | Shotgun Report® July 27, 2022
- When Score Matters July 26, 2022
Recent Comments
- blackwellopt on Jonny at the US Open
- Roland Leong on Jony Visits America
- blackwellopt on Jony Visits America
- Bob Warren on Browning B27
- Pete Kennedy on Cryogenic Treatment
- Pete Kennedy on Cryogenic Treatment
- russ quann on Cryogenic Treatment
- Bill E. on Cryogenic Treatment
- Gerald Elwood on Aftermarket Choke Answers
- Alfred E Garren on Aftermarket Choke Answers
Categories
Archives
Meta
-
Join 292 other followers
Shotgun Report® 
I will have the temerity to challenge Mr. Currie to show any empirically based information where porting of shotgun barrels display lessened recoil to the shooter. In addition, the reduction achieved by chamber forcing cone lengthening is very negligible and I have never seen any data to support it either.
Finally, I would submit that short and steep chamber forcing cones are no longer commonly found on any target gun or hunting guns either. They were commonplace decades ago during the card/fiber era to assist in quick sealing of gases behind the shot charge. They have not been used for a very long time now.
Constantly repeating these very old ideas by authorities like Mr. Currie et al, does not make them any more true today than yesteryear.
LikeLike